| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.98 MB | Adobe PDF | |||
| 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Introdução: A PubMed é a plataforma científica da área biomédica mais utilizada pelos profissionais de saúde em todo o mundo para realizar pesquisas de informação, validação de diagnósticos, procura da evidência científica e para efeitos académicos. Objetivo: Analisar a nova plataforma PubMed a partir do contributo de cinco peritos, contrastando experiências e averiguando como a visualizam face à sua prática profissional. Métodos: Metodologia qualitativa, com uma entrevista semiestruturada sobre as perceções de cinco peritos, representativos de um conjunto de utilizadores (bibliotecário, investigador, professor do ensino superior, médico e gestor editorial). Resultados: Constata-se que se perdeu a oportunidade de renovar de forma efetiva e válida a PubMed. Os perfis do investigador, do médico e do gestor editorial consideraram que a nova plataforma só é nova no visual, nada trazendo de novo para as suas práticas profissionais. Professor e bibliotecário, recorrendo à sua experiência pedagógica, consideraram-na um sinónimo de mudança de paradigma, assente na agilidade e na interoperabilidade de processos, mais amigável para os utilizadores, possibilitando a proximidade desta ferramenta ao cidadão comum. Conclusão: Diferentes utilizadores, com diferentes experiências, têm uma visão própria da PubMed. Os peritos esperavam também mais da nova plataforma, mais qualidade e mais maturidade tecnológica.
ABSTRACT - Introduction: PubMed is the biomedical scientific platform most used by health professionals worldwide to search for information, validate diagnoses, search for scientific evidence, and for academic purposes. Objective: To analyze the new PubMed platform based on the contributions of five experts in the field, contrasting experiences, and assessing how they see it in relation to their professional practice. Methods: Qualitative methodology, with a semi-structured interview about the perceptions of five experts, representing a set of users (librarian, researcher, academic professor, physician, and editorial manager). Results: It is found that the opportunity to renew PubMed effectively and validly has been missed. The researcher, physician, and editorial manager profiles considered that the new platform is only new in visuals, bringing nothing new to their professional practices. Professor and librarian, using their teaching experience, considered it a synonym of a paradigm shift, based on agility and process interoperability, more user-friendly, enabling the proximity of this tool to the common citizen. Conclusion: Different users, with different experiences, have their own vision of PubMed. Experts also expected more from the new platform, more quality, and more technological maturity.
ABSTRACT - Introduction: PubMed is the biomedical scientific platform most used by health professionals worldwide to search for information, validate diagnoses, search for scientific evidence, and for academic purposes. Objective: To analyze the new PubMed platform based on the contributions of five experts in the field, contrasting experiences, and assessing how they see it in relation to their professional practice. Methods: Qualitative methodology, with a semi-structured interview about the perceptions of five experts, representing a set of users (librarian, researcher, academic professor, physician, and editorial manager). Results: It is found that the opportunity to renew PubMed effectively and validly has been missed. The researcher, physician, and editorial manager profiles considered that the new platform is only new in visuals, bringing nothing new to their professional practices. Professor and librarian, using their teaching experience, considered it a synonym of a paradigm shift, based on agility and process interoperability, more user-friendly, enabling the proximity of this tool to the common citizen. Conclusion: Different users, with different experiences, have their own vision of PubMed. Experts also expected more from the new platform, more quality, and more technological maturity.
Description
Keywords
PubMed Navegabilidade Literacia digital Contraste de experiências Visualização Navigability Digital literacy Contrasting experiences Visualization
Citation
Antunes ML, Lopes C, Roque L. A nova plataforma PubMed: análise dos peritos. In: Silva CG, Revez J, Corujo L, editors. Organização do conhecimento no horizonte 2030: desenvolvimento sustentável e saúde (atas do V Congresso ISKO Espanha-Portugal). Lisboa: Centro de Estudos Clássicos; Colibri; 2021. p. 205-16.
Publisher
Centro de Estudos Clássicos