| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 358.94 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Este artigo faz uma pequena análise comparativa entre dois contos produzidos em períodos
históricos diferentes, mas relativamente próximos entre si: Conto de Escola de Machado de
Assis e Vínculos de Ildefonso Guimarães. O primeiro conto está ligado a um contexto mais
pedagógico e remete ao processo de ensino/aprendizagem repleto de hostilidade existente na
educação formal brasileira do século XIX. Já a narrativa de Ildefonso Guimarães tem como
temática os abusos policiais observados hoje (sobretudo na mídia), direcionados aos mais
pobres e vulneráveis, descrição em que se enquadra o protagonista ―Cabelo Cheio‖. Por meio
da comparação entre os dois contos, procura-se evidenciar de que forma o poder é exercido
pelas individualidades humanas em diferentes tipos de contexto, mostrando como muitas
vezes a violência, mesmo velada, está a serviço da manutenção de estruturas hierárquicas,
mesmo que apenas no plano individual. Em ambos os textos, há a presença do poder e da
submissão por meio de objetos de tortura e controle do corpo, o que reporta à tela de
Rugendas, que aborda os castigos sofridos pelos escravos africanos em terras brasileiras.
Neste último caso, o poder deixa de estar em um plano meramente de indivíduo para
indivíduo, passando a uma relação entre coletividades, aqui tendo um foco maior na violência
física explícita, num contexto de violência social bem mais amplo e complexo, cujas
consequências até hoje se veem presentes no cotidiano do país. Além de se examinarem as
narrativas e seus pontos em comum, busca-se na pintura contemplar alguns aspectos
filosóficos e comportamentais, utilizando-me dos pressupostos mostrados por Foucault no
ensaio Vigiar e Punir. Desta forma, espera-se mostrar como a literatura, mesmo configurandose
como arte, não consegue deixar de refletir as mais profundas relações de poder político
presentes na existência humana.
This paper makes a comparative analysis between two tales produced in different historical periods, but relatively close to each other: Conto de Escola by Machado de Assis and Vínculos by Ildefonso Guimarães. The first story is linked to a more pedagogical context and refers to the teaching / learning process filled with hostility in the Brazilian formal education of the nineteenth century. Already Ildefonso Guimarães narrative has as its theme the police abuse as seen today as occurrence directed especially to the poor and black, perfect description for the protagonist Cabelo Cheio. Through the comparative analysis between the two tales looking show how power is exercised by humankind in different types of context, showing how often the violence is at the service of maintaining a hierarchical structure, even if only in individual plan. In both texts, there is the presence of power and submission through torture objects and body control, which refers to the Rugendas screen that covers the punishments suffered by African slaves on Brazilian soil. In the latter case, the power is no longer in an individual plan for individual, lying on the relationship between communities, here with a greater focus on physical violence which lies within a context of cultural and social violence and broader complex and the consequences of which today are seen present in the country everyday. In addition to analyzing each of the narratives and their points in common with each other and painting, will be considered on-his philosophical and behavioral aspects using the assumptions shown by Foucault in his Vigiar e Punir test. Thus, expected to show how literature, even if configured as art, can not help but reflect deeper relationships of political power in the human existence.
This paper makes a comparative analysis between two tales produced in different historical periods, but relatively close to each other: Conto de Escola by Machado de Assis and Vínculos by Ildefonso Guimarães. The first story is linked to a more pedagogical context and refers to the teaching / learning process filled with hostility in the Brazilian formal education of the nineteenth century. Already Ildefonso Guimarães narrative has as its theme the police abuse as seen today as occurrence directed especially to the poor and black, perfect description for the protagonist Cabelo Cheio. Through the comparative analysis between the two tales looking show how power is exercised by humankind in different types of context, showing how often the violence is at the service of maintaining a hierarchical structure, even if only in individual plan. In both texts, there is the presence of power and submission through torture objects and body control, which refers to the Rugendas screen that covers the punishments suffered by African slaves on Brazilian soil. In the latter case, the power is no longer in an individual plan for individual, lying on the relationship between communities, here with a greater focus on physical violence which lies within a context of cultural and social violence and broader complex and the consequences of which today are seen present in the country everyday. In addition to analyzing each of the narratives and their points in common with each other and painting, will be considered on-his philosophical and behavioral aspects using the assumptions shown by Foucault in his Vigiar e Punir test. Thus, expected to show how literature, even if configured as art, can not help but reflect deeper relationships of political power in the human existence.
Description
Keywords
Violência Poder Sujeição Violence Power Bondage
Citation
Sales, M. L. (2016) Recorte da Arte Plástico-Literária nos Séculos XIX e XX: representação do poder in T., Pereira, A., A. Almeida, N., Vieira, M., C. Loureiro. Atas do VII Encontro do CIED – II Encontro Internacional, Estética e Arte em Educação. (422-431) Lisboa: CIED – Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudos Educacionais.
Publisher
CIED – Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudos Educacionais