Browsing by Author "Serra, Helena"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Binocular vision and reading ability in a Portuguese population of school age childrenPublication . Lança, Carla; Serra, Helena; Prista, JoãoPreventable visual loss caused by amblyopia (2 to 4%) and its risk factors such as strabismus (3%) and uncorrected refractive errors (5 to 7%) represent an important public health problem. Children with binocular vision anomalies could be at disadvantage in reading and writing. Objectives: (1) Describe binocular vision measures in children of school age; and (2) Describe the impact of abnormal binocular vision on reading ability (reading errors and reading speed).
- Desempenho na leitura em crianças: alterações da visão binocular ou dislexia?Publication . Lança, Carla; Serra, Helena; Prista, João20% a 30% das crianças em idade escolar apresentam algum tipo de perturbação visual. Quais são os tipos de competências de leitura (erros, velocidade de leitura, entre outros) que caracterizam as crianças com alterações da visão binocular? Objetivos do estudo - Caracterizar o desempenho da leitura, em crianças do 1º ciclo do ensino básico com e sem anomalias da visão binocular; iIdentificar o impacto das variáveis que influenciam o desempenho da leitura.
- Reading performance in children with visual function anomaliesPublication . Lança, Carla; Serra, Helena; Prista, JoãoAims - To compare reading performance in children with and without visual function anomalies and identify the influence of abnormal visual function and other variables in reading ability. Methods - A cross-sectional study was carried in 110 children of school age (6-11 years) with Abnormal Visual Function (AVF) and 562 children with Normal Visual Function (NVF). An orthoptic assessment (visual acuity, ocular alignment, near point of convergence and accommodation, stereopsis and vergences) and autorefraction was carried out. Oral reading was analyzed (list of 34 words). Number of errors, accuracy (percentage of success) and reading speed (words per minute - wpm) were used as reading indicators. Sociodemographic information from parents (n=670) and teachers (n=34) was obtained. Results - Children with AVF had a higher number of errors (AVF=3.00 errors; NVF=1.00 errors; p<0.001), a lower accuracy (AVF=91.18%; NVF=97.06%; p<0.001) and reading speed (AVF=24.71 wpm; NVF=27.39 wpm; p=0.007). Reading speed in the 3rd school grade was not statistically different between the two groups (AVF=31.41 wpm; NVF=32.54 wpm; p=0.113). Children with uncorrected hyperopia (p=0.003) and astigmatism (p=0.019) had worst reading performance. Children in 2nd, 3rd, or 4th grades presented a lower risk of having reading impairment when compared with the 1st grade. Conclusion - Children with AVF had reading impairment in the first school grade. It seems that reading abilities have a wide variation and this disparity lessens in older children. The slow reading characteristics of the children with AVF are similar to dyslexic children, which suggest the need for an eye evaluation before classifying the children as dyslexic.
- Rendimiento escolar e tipos de errores en la lectura en los niños con alteraciones de la función visualPublication . Lança, Carla; Serra, Helena; Prista, JoãoSe desarrolló un estudio descriptivo con el objetivo de evaluar el rendimiento escolar así como tipos de errores en la lectura en niños con alteraciones de la función visual. En el estudio participaron 672 niños del Municipio de Lisboa (7.69±1.19 años): grupo de control (función visual normal=562) y grupo experimental (alteraciones da función visual=110). Se cuestionaron 34 profesores acerca del rendimiento escolar y lectura a través de un cuestionario validado. Para la evaluación en la lectura se empleó la prueba de lectura de 34 palabras sueltas. Los niños con la función visual alterada mostraron niveles más bajos de rendimiento escolar. Estaban en el nivel "negativo" del 10,9% de los niños con la función visual alterada y sólo del 5,3% de los niños con la función visual normal. Estos niños comenten más errores en la lectura (p<0,001) con un mayor número de no palabras (3,09±5,20) en comparación con los niños con la función visual normal (1,44±3,09). Comenten también más omisiones y adiciones de letras y confusiones de grafema, teniendo dificultades en el análisis global de la palabra. Se propone un modelo de orientación para los profesores.