Browsing by Author "Wu, Ruben de Almeida"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Xinjiang: a critical discourse analysis of western media narratives concerning the Region & the Uyghur People (2017-2022)Publication . Wu, Ruben de Almeida; Bonacho, Fernanda do Rosário FarinhaThis analysis seeks to examine the journalistic narrative weaved by media outlets like The Washington Post and The New York Times that focuses on the ethnic concerns surrounding the Chinese Government against the Uyghur people, native to the region of Xinjiang. There seems to be a strong bias in the Western media coverage of this subject, which appears to align itself with western state interests. Examples of this can be equally found in articles made by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and the Cable News Network (CNN), and the similar sources they cite (Sun, 2019). An attempt will be made to draw a parallel between this western narrative and U.S. geopolitical interests policies, and how often they align. There appear to be some similarities with the grave accusations on China’s de-radicalisation strategy in the region and the accusations towards Iraq and their alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). The idea that the latter was a narrative pushed by the U.S. media to manufacture consent towards war in the Middle East has been thoroughly examined and confirmed by other investigators (Chomsky & Herman, 2011). Today, the focus has now shifted towards China as the U.S. fears to lose its own influence on Asia (Pilger, 2020). The Belt and Road Initiative, a sort of modernisation of the Silk Road, would greatly increase China’s sphere of influence (Zhou, 2019), of which Xinjiang is an important node for international connection. But much like the controversial Nord Stream 2 Pipeline linking Russia to Europe, they are apparent threats to the U. S. hegemony. The effects of Western media narratives over Iraq’s alleged WMD resulted in the destruction of homes and the death of innocents at the hands of the United States and its allies. By manufacturing consent, war was seen as enticing, virtuous even (Jaffer, 2021). The danger of similar media narratives in the present day is of great concern to me, which is why I decided to write about this subject. Another reason why I chose to investigate this subject was to understand the reasoning behind these claims and their apparent lack of consistency in the Western media narrative, specifically the biased nature of these allegations which range from “concentration camps”, to “forced labour” and even “genocide”. China’s treatment of the Uyghur minority is not a simple one-sided issue, and as such, should not be covered so matter-of-factly by journalistic discourse in Western media (Hadjab, & Filali, 2021). Sources that go against this narrative are often disregarded as being ‘state-affiliated’ to China, simply because their arguments favour it (Mozur, Zhong, Krolik & Aufrichti, 2021). Journalism should seek the truth of the matter from both sides, without waving aside valid opposing testimonies and reporting. One must question cui bono – who benefits from these media narratives: the media outlets that profit from a narrative that cultivates fear and ends up promoting intolerance against the other (Seneviratne & Muppidi, 2021), or the state government which seeks to maintain their influence and expand its geopolitical ambitions.