Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/10731
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Catarina Duarte-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Ana João-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Margarida Custódio dos-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Fátima-
dc.contributor.authorBárbara, Cristina-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-21T12:54:53Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-21T12:54:53Z-
dc.date.issued2019-11-
dc.identifier.citationSantos CD, Santos AJ, Santos M, Rodrigues F, Bárbara C. Pulmonary rehabilitation adapted index of self-efficacy (PRAISE) validated to Portuguese respiratory patients. Pulmonology. 2019;25(6):334-9.pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/10731-
dc.descriptionFCT_PDE/BDE/127785/2016pt_PT
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and Objectives - Recent updates on Pulmonary Rehabilitation highlight the importance of patients’ self-efficacy on long-term adherence to health-enhancing behaviors. The Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) is an adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt and evaluate the reliability and validity of PRAISE in Portuguese respiratory patients. Patients or Materials and Methods - Forward-backward translation and pilot testing were performed. Content validity was assessed by a multidisciplinary panel of expert judges. To evaluate reliability and validity, 150 respiratory outpatients on Pulmonary Rehabilitation participated in a cross-sectional study. Descriptive and reliability analyses and exploratory factorial analysis using principal axis factoring, followed by oblique oblimin factor rotation were conducted to identify construct validity. IBM® SPSS® version 22 was used to perform statistical analysis. Results - 150 patients with a mean age of 67 years, 54% male and 83% currently on Pulmonary Rehabilitation participated in the study. These included mainly Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients (46.7%) but also Bronchiectasis (20%), Interstitial Lung Disease (20%) and other respiratory diseases. PRAISE's mean score was 49. Exploratory factor analysis extraction provided a 4-factor solution that cumulatively explained 52.3% of total variance (F1: 26.6%; F2: 9.7%; F3: 8.7%; F4: 7.3%). Portuguese PRAISE showed the reliability of 0.78 (Chronbach alpha). Conclusions - The Portuguese version of PRAISE showed adequate psychometric properties for it to be used as an instrument to measure self-efficacy as a patient-centered outcome on Pulmonary Rehabilitation.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.relationFCT_PDE/BDE/127785/2016pt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectPneumologypt_PT
dc.subjectRehabilitationpt_PT
dc.subjectSelf-efficacypt_PT
dc.subjectPRAISE validitypt_PT
dc.subjectPDE/BDE/127785/2016pt_PT
dc.subjectPortugalpt_PT
dc.titlePulmonary rehabilitation adapted index of self-efficacy (PRAISE) validated to Portuguese respiratory patientspt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage334pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage339pt_PT
degois.publication.issue6pt_PT
degois.publication.titlePulmonologypt_PT
degois.publication.volume25pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S253104371930131X?via%3Dihubpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.06.003pt_PT
Appears in Collections:ESTeSL - Artigos



FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote 

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.