Repository logo
 
Publication

Nutritional status, functional status, and quality of life: what is the impact and relationship on cancer patients?

dc.contributor.authorSantos, Inês Miranda
dc.contributor.authorMendes, Lino
dc.contributor.authorCarolino, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Carla Adriana
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-09T12:44:26Z
dc.date.available2020-12-09T12:44:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-11
dc.description.abstractRationale and aims: Malnutrition is common and multifactorial in cancer patients (CP), combining the systemic inflammatory process with decreased food intake, loss of muscle and bone mass, and decreased functional status (FS). We aimed to track and evaluate the nutritional status (NS) of CP; associate results between hospitalized patients (HP) and day hospital patients (DHP); associate NS with tumor, symptoms, and FS. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study in HP or DHP from Garcia de Orta Hospital, over 18 years old. NS was monitored and evaluated using Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), and anthropometric and biochemical parameters. To assess FS we used the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), Karnofsky Performance Scale Index (KPSI), and handgrip dynamometer (HGD). Results: The 265 CP (114-HP, 151-DHP), of which 34.2%-HP and 17.2%-DHP had low BMI. From NRS-2002, 86.0% and 35.8% were respectively at nutritional risk. Using PG-SGA, 93.0% and 39.7% were respectively malnourished. PG-SGA were positively correlated with ECOG (p < 0.01) and negatively correlated with KPSI (p < 0.01), BMI (p < 0.01), and handgrip strength-HGS (p < 0.01-DHP and p < 0.05-HP). Conclusions: PG-SGA and FS scales are appropriate and validated tools for early identification of malnutrition and FS in CP. HGD can be a useful tool for assessing FS and NS.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationSantos IM, Mendes L, Carolino E, Santos CA. Nutritional status, functional status, and quality of life: what is the impact and relationship on cancer patients? Nutr Cancer. 2021;73(11-12):2554-67.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01635581.2020.1839520pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/12430
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01635581.2020.1839520?journalCode=hnuc20pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectOncologypt_PT
dc.subjectCancer patientpt_PT
dc.subjectNutritional statuspt_PT
dc.subjectFunctional statuspt_PT
dc.subjectQuality of lifept_PT
dc.titleNutritional status, functional status, and quality of life: what is the impact and relationship on cancer patients?pt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage14pt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage2567pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue11-12pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage2554pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleNutrition and Cancerpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume73pt_PT
person.familyNameMendes
person.familyNameCarolino
person.givenNameLino
person.givenNameElisabete
person.identifier.ciencia-id7213-B138-6343
person.identifier.ciencia-id1216-EFA3-1E0F
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7237-6272
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4165-7052
person.identifier.ridF-1012-2015
person.identifier.scopus-author-id25821697000
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9a2fab80-3846-4dc3-a073-fad137f4a38c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication77930d39-ed34-44dc-a4a6-9bf833e5e688
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery77930d39-ed34-44dc-a4a6-9bf833e5e688

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Nutritional status, functional status, and quality of life_what is the impact and relationship on cancer patients.pdf
Size:
1.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections