Repository logo
 
Publication

Curricula, attributes and clinical experiences of radiography programs in four European educational institutions

dc.contributor.authorReis, Cláudia
dc.contributor.authorJorge, José
dc.contributor.authorYork, H.
dc.contributor.authorFlaction, L.
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, S.
dc.contributor.authorMaehle, S.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-21T09:39:57Z
dc.date.available2018-09-21T09:39:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.description.abstractIntroduction - The aim of this study was to compare radiography curricula, teaching/learning strategies, skill development, clinical practice outcomes and research development delivered by four European educational institutions. Methods - This study was carried out in two phases: the first focused on curricula analysis; the second involved online questionnaires to ascertain data from two key-informants: students who had recently completed their bachelor thesis and teaching staff. Questionnaires were designed to capture teaching and learning strategies, skill acquisition and outcomes of clinical practice and research. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were performed according to the nature of the questions. Results - The European Credits Transfer System dedicated per core subject area (natural sciences, clinical practice, research, imaging technology, humanities) differed between institutions. Students classified technical, practical and communication skills as the most important, teaching-staff highlighted also critical thinking. The students defined as “very good” their experience in radiography (58.5%) and computed-tomography (45%). Magnetic resonance imaging practice was considered “Average” by 53% of the UK-students and “Good” by the other European students (40%). According to 71% (55/78) of the students, research work contributed to the development of critical/reflective thinking. Conclusions - The four radiography programs presented variations in curricula, contact-hours, clinical experience, and outcomes. Research units allowed the participant-students to develop their critical thinking capabilities. The outcomes from clinical practice differ across the institutions, mainly due to differences in background and access to specialties. Further work is necessary to assess the real impact of different radiography programs on professional and academic mobility across Europe.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationReis CS, Pires-Jorge J, York H, Flaction L, Johansen S, Maehlee S. Curricula, attributes and clinical experiences of radiography programs in four European educational institutions. Radiography. 2018;24(3):e61-8.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radi.2018.03.002pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/8872
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817418300178pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectRadiologypt_PT
dc.subjectRadiography educationpt_PT
dc.subjectTeaching staffpt_PT
dc.subjectSkillspt_PT
dc.subjectClinical outcomespt_PT
dc.titleCurricula, attributes and clinical experiences of radiography programs in four European educational institutionspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPagee68pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue3pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPagee61pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleRadiographypt_PT
oaire.citation.volume24pt_PT
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Curricula, attributes and clinical experiences of radiography programs in four European educational institutions.pdf
Size:
809.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections