| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 582.67 KB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Ultimamente, o desempenho ambiental passou a ser uma prioridade a nĆvel mundial, incentivando a crescente consciencialização relativa a questƵes ecológicas e Ć procura por prĆ”ticas sustentĆ”veis. O estudo investiga de que forma as caracterĆsticas do conselho de administração influenciam o desempenho ambiental das empresas. Para alĆ©m dos efeitos diretos, analisa tambĆ©m relaƧƵes indiretas e condicionais considerando o CSR Committee como variĆ”vel independente, a diversidade de gĆ©nero como mediadora e a dimensĆ£o
cultural de masculinity / femininity de Hofstede como moderadora. O estudo irĆ” concentrar-se entre os anos de 2015 a 2024, nos paĆses fundadores dos BRICS (Brasil, RĆŗssia, Ćndia, China e Ćfrica do Sul), devido a cada um possuir caracterĆsticas Ćŗnicas em termos de mercado, cultura e regulamentação ambiental. Os resultados indicam que a dimensĆ£o do conselho, a diversidade de gĆ©nero, a presenƧa de membros nĆ£o executivos e a existĆŖncia de comitĆ©s de sustentabilidade estĆ£o positivamente associadas ao desempenho ambiental, enquanto o CEO duality e a presenƧa de membros independentes apresentam efeitos negativos. A anĆ”lise de regressĆ£o confirmou a relevĆ¢ncia das variĆ”veis de governance, ainda que com poder explicativo moderado. O modelo de mediaçãomoderação de Hayes revelou que o impacto dos CSR Committees depende do contexto cultural: em paĆses com culturas mais femininas, estes comitĆ©s favorecem a diversidade de gĆ©nero e associam-se a melhores prĆ”ticas ambientais, ao passo que em culturas mais masculinas o efeito Ć© reduzido ou negativo. Estes resultados sublinham que os mecanismos de governance nĆ£o sĆ£o universais e que a cultura nacional condiciona a sua
eficÔcia, destacando a importância da diversidade e da adaptação às especificidades contextuais para promover prÔticas empresariais sustentÔveis.
Lately, environmental performance has become a global priority, encouraging growing awareness of ecological issues and the search for sustainable practices. This study investigates how the characteristics of the board of directorsā influence companiesā environmental performance. Beyond direct effects, it also analyses indirect and conditional relationships, considering the CSR Committee as the independent variable, gender diversity as the mediator, and Hofstedeās masculinity/femininity cultural dimension as the moderator. The study focuses on the years 2015 to 2024 in the founding BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), as each presents unique features in terms of market, culture, and environmental regulation. The results indicate that board size, gender diversity, the presence of non-executive members, and the existence of sustainability committees are positively associated with environmental performance, whereas CEO duality and the presence of independent members show negative effects. The regression analysis confirmed the relevance of governance variables, although with moderate explanatory power. Hayesā mediation-moderation model revealed that the impact of CSR Committees depends on cultural context: in more feminine cultures, these committees promote gender diversity and are linked to better environmental practices, whereas in more masculine cultures, the effect is weaker or negative. These findings highlight that governance mechanisms are not universal and that national culture conditions their effectiveness, stressing the importance of diversity and contextual adaptation in fostering sustainable business practices.
Lately, environmental performance has become a global priority, encouraging growing awareness of ecological issues and the search for sustainable practices. This study investigates how the characteristics of the board of directorsā influence companiesā environmental performance. Beyond direct effects, it also analyses indirect and conditional relationships, considering the CSR Committee as the independent variable, gender diversity as the mediator, and Hofstedeās masculinity/femininity cultural dimension as the moderator. The study focuses on the years 2015 to 2024 in the founding BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), as each presents unique features in terms of market, culture, and environmental regulation. The results indicate that board size, gender diversity, the presence of non-executive members, and the existence of sustainability committees are positively associated with environmental performance, whereas CEO duality and the presence of independent members show negative effects. The regression analysis confirmed the relevance of governance variables, although with moderate explanatory power. Hayesā mediation-moderation model revealed that the impact of CSR Committees depends on cultural context: in more feminine cultures, these committees promote gender diversity and are linked to better environmental practices, whereas in more masculine cultures, the effect is weaker or negative. These findings highlight that governance mechanisms are not universal and that national culture conditions their effectiveness, stressing the importance of diversity and contextual adaptation in fostering sustainable business practices.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
CaracterĆsticas do Conselho de Administração Cultura nacional BRICS Desempenho ambiental Modelo de Hayes Board characteristics National culture Environmental performance Hayes model
