Repository logo
 
Publication

Revistas e editoras predadoras no campo da saúde: problemática e recomendações aos investigadores

dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Maria Da Luz
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Maria Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-28T15:16:59Z
dc.date.available2022-12-28T15:16:59Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.description.abstractRESUMEN - Se analiza la problemática de las revistas y editoriales depredadoras en el campo de la salud, identificando sus características y los conocimientos adquiridos. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura en salud indexada en ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, SciELO y Web of Science a lo largo de 2020 y 2021 en marzo de 2022. Se constató la creciente preocupación por revistas y editoriales depredadoras en los últimos años, especialmente a partir de 2015 y confirmada a partir de 2017. Las cifras de 2021 y primeros meses de 2022 acompañan esta escalada. Web of Science, Scopus y PubMed son las bases de datos que muestran una clara preocupación por las ciencias de la salud. Como conclusión, la presión por publicar y la dificultad para distinguir la revista legítima de la ilegítima propician un ambiente favorable a la proliferación de publicaciones cuestionables. Los investigadores deben tomar una postura exigente e informada en interés de la confiabilidad de la ciencia, desarrollando buenas prácticas de investigación, evitando la inclusión de datos falsos, plagiados o manipulados, que perjudiquen la calidad de los resultados y conclusiones, influyendo negativamente en la evidencia científica, la práctica clínica y, en última instancia, los pacientes.pt_PT
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT - The problem of predatory journals and publishers in the health field is analyzed, identifying characteristics and the insights acquired. A review of health literature indexed in ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, and Web of Science was conducted in 2020 and 2021. The data survey was confirmed in March 2022. The analysis allowed the characterization of the phenomenon and verify the negative effects on the health sciences, and therefore a set of recommendations was written for the researchers. A growing apprehension with predatory journals and publishers was evidenced over the past few years, especially from 2015, and confirmed since 2017. Figures for 2021 and the first months of 2022 follow this increase. The Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed are the databases that show a notorious concern with health sciences. The pressure to publish and the difficulty in discerning legitimate journals from illegitimate ones foster a favorable environment for the proliferation of questionable publications. Researchers should assume good research practices with a demanding and informed attitude on behalf of the reliability of science, by avoiding the inclusion of false, plagiarized, or manipulated data, which damage the quality of the results and conclusions, influencing scientific evidence, clinical practice, and ultimately the patients, in a negative way.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationAntunes ML, Lopes C, Borges MM. Revistas e editoras predadoras no campo da saúde: problemática e recomendações aos investigadores. Ibersid: rev sist inform docum. 2022;16(2):57-64.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.54886/ibersid.v16i2.4818pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/15212
dc.language.isoporpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.ibersid.eu/ojs/index.php/ibersid/article/view/4818pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectRevistas predadoraspt_PT
dc.subjectEditoras predadoraspt_PT
dc.subjectCiências da saúdept_PT
dc.subjectÉtica na investigaçãopt_PT
dc.subjectRevistas depredadoraspt_PT
dc.subjectEditoriales depredadoraspt_PT
dc.subjectCiencias de la saludpt_PT
dc.subjectInvestigadorespt_PT
dc.subjectProducción cientificapt_PT
dc.subjectEstados de la cuestiónpt_PT
dc.subjectÉtica de la investigaciónpt_PT
dc.subjectPredatory journalspt_PT
dc.subjectPredatory publisherspt_PT
dc.subjectHealth sciencespt_PT
dc.subjectResearcherspt_PT
dc.subjectScientific productionpt_PT
dc.subjectLiterature reviewpt_PT
dc.subjectResearch ethicspt_PT
dc.titleRevistas e editoras predadoras no campo da saúde: problemática e recomendações aos investigadorespt_PT
dc.title.alternativePredatory journals and publishers in the health domain: problems and recommendations for researcherspt_PT
dc.title.alternativeRevistas y editoriales depredadoras en el campo de la salud: problemática y recomendaciones para los investigadorespt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage64pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue2pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage57pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleIbersid: revista de sistemas de información y documentaciónpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume16pt_PT
person.familyNameAntunes
person.familyNameLopes de Figueiredo Costa Marques Borges
person.givenNameMaria Luz
person.givenNameMaria Manuel
person.identifier2087122
person.identifierN-6530-2013
person.identifierI-1028-2012
person.identifier.ciencia-idB111-6F38-5904
person.identifier.ciencia-id7916-AB38-9931
person.identifier.ciencia-id821F-CED0-75EA
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0942-7601
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6440-4739
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7755-6168
person.identifier.ridB-8661-2015
person.identifier.scopus-author-id57202291460
person.identifier.scopus-author-id15074167200
person.identifier.scopus-author-id37123527600
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdce3e466-ad17-4bea-8b95-4a5b9bb22910
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5bce7415-d4e2-4c10-86e7-a87c4b69407f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6bceaf4a-941a-4cad-a4b7-a0e14230f7d5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6bceaf4a-941a-4cad-a4b7-a0e14230f7d5

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Revistas e editoras predadoras no campo da saúde_problemática e recomendações aos investigadores.pdf
Size:
267.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections