Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparing Freshman and doctoral engineering students in design: mapping with a descriptive framework

dc.contributor.authorMarques, Pedro
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-20T10:12:51Z
dc.date.available2018-02-20T10:12:51Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports the results of a study of engineering students' approaches to an open-ended design problem. To carry out this, sketches and interviews were collected from 9 freshmen (first year) and 10 doctoral engineering students, when they designed solutions for orange squeezers. Sketches and interviews were analysed and mapped with a descriptive 'ideation framework' (IF) of the design process, to document and compare their design creativity (Carmona Marques, P., A. Silva, E. Henriques, and C. Magee. 2014. "A Descriptive Framework of the Design Process from a Dual Cognitive Engineering Perspective." International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 2 (3): 142-164). The results show that the designers worked in a manner largely consistent with the IF for generalisation and specialisation loops. Also, doctoral students produced more alternative solutions during the ideation process. In addition, compared to freshman, doctoral used the generalisation loop of the IF, working at higher levels of abstraction. The iterative nature of design is highlighted during this study - a potential contribution to decrease the gap between both groups in engineering education.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationMARQUES, P. Carmona – Comparing Freshman and doctoral engineering students in design: mapping with a descriptive framework. European Journal of Engineering Education. ISSN 0304-3797. Vol. 42, N.º 6 (2017), pp. 1097-1112pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03043797.2016.1263277pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0304-3797
dc.identifier.issn1469-5898
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/8070
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherTaylor & Francispt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03043797.2016.1263277?needAccess=truept_PT
dc.subjectCreativitypt_PT
dc.subjectDesign cognitionpt_PT
dc.subjectDesign educationpt_PT
dc.subjectFreshman and doctoral studentspt_PT
dc.subjectEngineering designpt_PT
dc.titleComparing Freshman and doctoral engineering students in design: mapping with a descriptive frameworkpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1112pt_PT
oaire.citation.issue6pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1097pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleEuropean Journal of Engineering Educationpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume42pt_PT
person.familyNameMarques
person.givenNamePedro
person.identifier.ciencia-id2812-A48A-6813
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4891-1754
person.identifier.ridH-3387-2013
person.identifier.scopus-author-id55854236200
rcaap.rightsclosedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdf7afbd5-979d-4622-b9fe-2d73de2ff1c1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverydf7afbd5-979d-4622-b9fe-2d73de2ff1c1

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Comparing_PCMarques_ADEM.pdf
Size:
2.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: