Browsing by Author "Velez, Ana Rita"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Assessing the comparability and the understandability of the information on cash flows by European-listed entitiesPublication . Velez, Ana Rita; Albuquerque, Fábio; Pinto, VeraThis chapter aims to assess the comparability and understandability of information on cash flows through the choices by entities in the presentation of the statement of cash flows (SCF) and the disclosure of non-generally accepted accounting principles measures (NGM) related to cash flow information, respectively. Data were obtained from 484 consolidated annual reports, between 2018 and 2021, from 121 entities listed on Euronext. The findings indicated that interest paid and received (dividends paid) were generally classified in the operating (financing) category, contrary to (aligned with) the proposed in the exposure draft (ED) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The findings also showed that entities often disclose NGM related to cash flows and present their formula and the possibility of reconciliation with the SCF. This research contributes to the discussion around the comparability, and understandability of information in the context of the current IASB's ED, which aims to standardise the presentation and the disclosure requirements on cash flows.
- What is more relevant? A comparison of cash flows indicators versus profit or loss from listed European companiesPublication . Velez, Ana Rita; Pinto, Vera; Albuquerque, Fábio; Ntim, Collins G.There is still controversy regarding the relevance of cash flow versus accruals. Relevant information can be assessed in multiple ways, including its value relevance and predictability. This paper then compares the value relevance and pre dictive value of accruals and cash flow measures to determine entities’ stock value and future cash flows, respectively. The data was obtained from 484 consolidated annual reports of 121 companies listed on Euronext between 2018 and 2021. Data assessment used a linear regression model. The findings suggest that cash flow measures have a more significant influence on stock prices than profit or loss (about 40% versus 20%, based on the models’ explanatory power). Furthermore, historical cash flows are proven to be a better predictor of future cash flows than profit or loss (90% versus 80%). Furthermore, neither accrual nor cash flow measures forecast future profit or loss significantly (below 35% in all cases). Findings also indicate a reduced capability of accrual or cash flow measures to forecast future profit or loss. This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on the relevance of cash flow versus accrual measures, which still presents differing conclusions. As part of its innovation, it compares profit or loss with multiple cash flow measures, such as non-GAAP measures and the concept introduced by the IASB in its exposure draft for operating cash flow. Additionally, the study examines the potential impacts and benefits of changes proposed in the IASB’s expo sure draft, including how they can affect stock prices and forecast future cash flows.