Repository logo
 
Loading...
Profile Picture

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • A cultura e as características qualitativas da informação financeira: um estudo empírico com base em empresas cotadas em distintos mercados europeus
    Publication . Texeira Fernandes Justino, Maria Do Rosário; Albuquerque, Fábio; Texeira Quirós, Joaquín; Rodrigues, Nuno Miguel Barroso
    A presente investigação visa aferir a eventual existência de associação entre os valores culturais propostos por Gray (1988) e as características qualitativas no relato financeiro, no âmbito da revisão da Estrutura Conceitual conjuntamente desenvolvida entre o Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) e o International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). A recolha dos dados foi realizada a partir dos relatórios e contas consolidados anuais, relativos a 2013 e 2014, divulgados pelas entidades não financeiras cotadas nos índices bolsistas referentes a mercados financeiros da União Europeia (UE): PSI-20, IBEX-35, FTSE-100, DAX-30 e OMX-S30. Após a aplicação dos critérios de seleção, a população final deste estudo engloba 137 entidades. Foi utilizada a análise de conteúdo como método de pesquisa. Os resultados obtidos a partir da aplicação do teste estatístico de Mann-Whitney-U sugerem que o conservadorismo encontra-se negativamente associado à relevância da informação financeira. Avaliar o impacto da cultura no processo de convergência internacional, bem como dos elementos que se encontram associados a essa problemática, constitui um dos contributos científicos desta investigação.
  • The Influence of Culture and Professional Judgment on Accounting: An Analysis from the Perspective of Information Preparers in Portugal
    Publication . Texeira Fernandes Justino, Maria Do Rosário; Albuquerque, Fábio; Texeira Quirós, Joaquín; Marcelino, Manuela Maria
    The standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (Iasb) are based on principles, which delegate decisions on accounting matters to professional judgment, based on the concepts existing in those standards, with implications for financial reporting. The objective in this study is to analyze the influence of culture on professional judgment, through the analysis of the existence of significant differences in the decisions about the disclosure or recognition of liabilities and assets, as well as to validate (or not) the classification Gray (1988) attributed to Portugal concerning the accounting values of conservatism and secrecy. In that sense, the concepts established in Accounting and Financial Reporting Standard (NCRF) 21, entitled Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. Based on the distribution of a questionnaire to the information preparers, which resulted in a sample of 408 professionals, it could be identified through the use of bivariate statistical techniques that there are significant differences in the professionals’ perception of asset and liability disclosure and recognition, revealing a stronger trend towards the disclosure or recognition of liabilities. Concerning conservatism and secrecy, using multivariate statistical techniques, a higher level of conservatism could be verified as an accounting value in Portugal, as well as the existence of an association between conservatism and secrecy. This study attracts standardizing entities’ attention to the importance of aspects related to the information disclosed in the financial statements, particularly regarding the professional judgment.
  • An Analysis of Differences in Terms of Professional Interests Based on the Project to Replace IAS 39
    Publication . Texeira Fernandes Justino, Maria Do Rosário; Albuquerque, Fábio; Texeira Quirós, Joaquín; Carvalho, Cláudia Daniela Ferreira da Mota
    The professional interests of the various stakeholders groups are often seen as obstacles to full accounting harmonization. Studying different professional interests in the accounting domain is significant for organizations involved in the international accounting harmonization process, insofar as it enables them to identify the main obstacles to face in order to achieve full harmonization. Thus, this article is aimed at analyzing the differences in terms of professional interests by addressing the participation of various stakeholders groups in the process of issuing/modifying standards of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Based on content analysis, we examined the comment letters sent to the IASB in the context of the first part of the first phase of the project to replace the International Accounting Standard (IAS) 39, entitled “Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement”, by the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9, on its turn entitled “Financial Instruments”. Respondents were identified according to the stakeholders group, and, later, the collected data underwent a nonparametric chi-square test. The results of this study indicate there are significant differences between the answers obtained from the various stakeholders groups involved in the process of issuing or reviewing a standard of the IASB, above all made clear between the group of financial preparers and the regulatory and/or standard-setting agencies and the professional associations related to accounting.