Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/6256
Título: Are physical measures good indicators of image quality at low dose levels? A pilot study
Autor: Lança, Luís
Andersen, E. N.
Carvalho, G.
Gerwen, M.
Jorge, José
Kleiker, M.
Markali, B.
Nightingale, P.
Hogg, Peter
Palavras-chave: Radiology
Image quality
Dosimetry
X-ray
Data: 2016
Editora: Hanze University of Applied Sciences
Citação: Lança L, Andersen EN, Carvalho G, Gerwen v. M, Jorge J, Kleiker M, et al. Are physical measures good indicators of image quality at low dose levels? A pilot study. In: Hogg P, Blakeley C, Buissink C, editors. OPTIMAX 2015 – Multicultural team-based research in radiography: a holistic educational approach. Groningen: Hanze University of Applied Sciences; 2016. p. 128-42.
Resumo: Purpose: To evaluate if physical measures of noise predict image quality at high and low noise levels. Method: Twenty-four images were acquired on a DR system using a Pehamed DIGRAD phantom at three kVp settings (60, 70 and 81) across a range of mAs values. The image acquisition setup consisted of 14 cm of PMMA slabs with the phantom placed in the middle at 120 cm SID. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and Contrast-tonoise ratio (CNR) were calculated for each of the images using ImageJ software and 14 observers performed image scoring. Images were scored according to the observer`s evaluation of objects visualized within the phantom. Results: The R2 values of the non-linear relationship between objective visibility score and CNR (60kVp R2 = 0.902; 70Kvp R2 = 0.913; 80kVp R2 = 0.757) demonstrate a better fit for all 3 kVp settings than the linear R2 values. As CNR increases for all kVp settings the Object Visibility also increases. The largest increase for SNR at low exposure values (up to 2 mGy) is observed at 60kVp, when compared with 70 or 81kVp.CNR response to exposure is similar. Pearson r was calculated to assess the correlation between Score, OV, SNR and CNR. None of the correlations reached a level of statistical significance (p>0.01). Conclusion: For object visibility and SNR, tube potential variations may play a role in object visibility. Higher energy X-ray beam settings give lower SNR but higher object visibility. Object visibility and CNR at all three tube potentials are similar, resulting in a strong positive relationship between CNR and object visibility score. At low doses the impact of radiographic noise does not have a strong influence on object visibility scores because in noisy images objects could still be identified.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/6256
ISBN: 9781907842771
Versão do Editor: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/38008/1/Ebook%20Hanze%202015.pdf
Aparece nas colecções:ESTeSL - Capítulos ou partes de livros

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Are physical measures good indicators of image quality at low dose levels.pdf8 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.